By Flight Streamer, private pilot and flight simulation creator. Published . Updated .
Review at a glance
I tested the MOZA MA3F EFCM Airbus FCU and dual EFIS setup with the Fenix A320 in MSFS 2024. Clear displays, full-size controls and modular pricing impressed me. An initial push-pull issue was resolved with a firmware update and calibration.
These observations describe the setup tested in this review. For the rest of my cockpit, see my flight simulator setup.
MOZA entered the Airbus flight-sim hardware market with a product that immediately got my attention for one reason: price.
The MOZA MA3F EFCM combines a full-size Airbus-style FCU with optional left and right EFIS modules, and the complete three-panel setup costs far less than many established cockpit-building alternatives.
But a lower price only matters if the hardware is actually good to use.
I tested the complete MA3F EFCM setup with the Fenix A320 in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024, including normal FCU operation, push-pull interactions, EFIS controls, software setup and repeated use during flights.
My first experience was not completely smooth. The push-pull functions initially did not work properly. After updating the firmware and running calibration, the issue was resolved.
That ended up being one of the most useful parts of the review because it showed how much the MA3F depends on having the software and firmware properly configured.
Quick verdict
The MA3F EFCM is a very competitive Airbus FCU and EFIS setup for the price.
Once updated and calibrated, the controls worked well in my Fenix A320 testing. The encoders felt responsive, the push-pull interaction behaved correctly, the displays were clear, and the full-size format fit naturally into an Airbus desktop cockpit.
The main thing I would tell a new owner is simple: update the firmware before assuming anything is wrong with the hardware.
What is the MOZA MA3F EFCM?
The MA3F EFCM is a modular Airbus flight-control panel consisting of three separately sold units:
- MA3F EFCM center FCU
- MA3F EFCM left EFIS
- MA3F EFCM right EFIS
At the time of my review, the pricing was:
| Module | Price |
|---|---|
| MA3F FCU | $149 USD |
| Left EFIS | $99 USD |
| Right EFIS | $99 USD |
| Complete three-module setup | $347 USD |
That modular pricing is useful because you can start with the FCU and add one or both EFIS panels later.
Full-size dimensions matter more than they sound
The center module is designed around full-size A320 proportions rather than a compact interpretation.
The FCU is approximately 260 mm wide, while each EFIS module is approximately 155 mm wide.
That matters in a dedicated Airbus setup because the controls sit where your hands expect them to sit.
A smaller panel can perform the same software functions, but a properly sized FCU feels much more natural when it is mounted below the main display and used together with a physical sidestick, throttle quadrant and other cockpit hardware.
The displays look right for an Airbus panel
One of the things I liked about the MA3F is that the displays do not simply look like generic screens placed behind an Airbus faceplate.
The segmented readouts are styled specifically for the FCU layout, including the asymmetric character appearance associated with the real panel.
In use, the displays were clear and easy to read.
This is important because the FCU is constantly in your field of view. Even small visual differences become noticeable when the panel is directly in front of you for an entire flight.
Push-pull controls are the feature that really matters
The main Airbus FCU knobs need to do more than rotate.
Airbus uses push and pull actions to move between managed and selected modes, so the physical interaction is a large part of the experience.
The MA3F recreates that push-pull behavior.
After I resolved the initial firmware issue, the knobs felt pleasantly responsive. Rotating through speed, heading and altitude values worked well, and switching between push and pull became much more natural than using a mouse in the virtual cockpit.
For me, this is the biggest reason to use a dedicated FCU.
It is not about adding a function that the simulator does not already have. It is about moving an important set of controls out of the virtual cockpit and into muscle memory.
My initial problem with the push-pull functions
When I first set up the MA3F, the push-pull functions did not work correctly.
That immediately raised the obvious question: was the hardware faulty?
In my case, no.
A firmware update and calibration fixed the issue.
After that, the push-pull controls behaved as expected in the Fenix A320.
This is why I would not judge the panel before checking both the MOZA Cockpit version and the device firmware.
For new hardware, software maturity can make a major difference to the first impression.
MOZA Cockpit software
The MA3F uses MOZA Cockpit as its configuration and integration software.
The software handles the hardware connection, firmware and settings, including lighting behavior.
I found the overall experience straightforward once the device was on the correct firmware.
The fact that MOZA has its own flight-sim software ecosystem also makes the product more approachable for users who do not want to build custom scripts or mappings for every control.
One USB connection keeps the setup cleaner
The complete panel arrangement is designed to avoid turning into a pile of unrelated devices and cables.
The center FCU uses USB-C, with the side modules integrated into the overall setup.
For a modular cockpit, that is more useful than it sounds.
My simulator changes between Airbus, Boeing and other aircraft, so I care about hardware that can be mounted cleanly without permanently taking over the desk.
The included mounting hardware helps with that.
Testing with the Fenix A320 in MSFS 2024
My review testing focused on the Fenix A320 in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024.
Once the firmware issue was resolved, the MA3F worked well through normal Airbus operations.
I used the physical controls for speed, heading, altitude and vertical modes, along with the EFIS functions.
The biggest improvement was not speed. It was continuity.
Instead of looking for the FCU with the mouse, the physical controls were always in the same place. That makes routine changes during departure, climb, approach and landing much easier to perform without breaking your flow.
The EFIS modules complete the setup
The left and right EFIS panels are optional, but together they make the MA3F feel like a proper Airbus glareshield control section rather than a standalone autopilot controller.
The EFIS modules handle the controls you would expect around the navigation display workflow, letting you keep more of the normal Airbus interaction off the screen.
At $99 USD per side, they also let buyers choose how far they want to take the setup.
Someone using only the captain side can build differently from someone creating a full-width Airbus panel.
Extension functions add more utility
The MA3F system also includes an extension mode that can turn one of the side panels into an additional control layer.
That can be useful because some physical controls are used less frequently during parts of the flight.
Instead of leaving a panel mostly idle, the extra layer can be mapped to additional functions such as transponder, TCAS, weather radar or other aircraft controls.
I see that as a bonus rather than the main reason to buy the product.
The core reason remains the physical FCU and EFIS workflow.
Build quality and control feel
The MA3F feels much better than its price might suggest.
The controls have a reassuring amount of resistance and the knobs do not feel like loose generic encoders.
The push-pull mechanism is especially important because it is used constantly in an Airbus.
I would not describe the MA3F as identical to certified cockpit hardware, and I would not make that claim from a home-sim review. What I can say is that the controls felt solid and responsive during my testing.
Where the MA3F fits in the market
The Airbus FCU market already has several established options.
That makes MOZA's timing interesting because the MA3F is not entering an empty category.
Its strongest argument is the combination of:
- Full-size layout
- Dedicated FCU displays
- Physical push-pull controls
- Modular EFIS panels
- MOZA Cockpit software
- Competitive pricing
That gives it a very clear place in the market.
It is not trying to be the cheapest generic autopilot panel. It is trying to offer a convincing dedicated Airbus interface without moving into the much more expensive end of cockpit hardware.
What I liked most
The value proposition is strong, but the thing I appreciated most was how normal the panel felt once it was configured properly.
I could simply reach for the FCU and use it.
The displays were easy to read, the encoders were responsive, and the push-pull controls worked the way I expected after calibration.
The modular construction is also a good idea because not everyone needs two EFIS units on day one.
What I would improve
The initial firmware issue is the biggest negative from my testing.
A new user could easily interpret non-working push-pull controls as a hardware failure.
The fix was straightforward in my case, but I would prefer a product in this category to arrive with fewer chances for that kind of first-use confusion.
Software support will also be important over time. Hardware like this depends on continued compatibility with aircraft add-ons and simulator updates.
Who should buy the MOZA MA3F EFCM?
The MA3F makes the most sense for someone who:
- Flies the Airbus A320 regularly
- Uses the Fenix A320 or another supported Airbus add-on
- Wants physical push-pull FCU controls
- Wants full-size hardware
- Likes a modular cockpit
- Wants to add EFIS panels without buying everything at once
- Wants a lower-cost alternative to premium cockpit hardware
It makes less sense if you rarely fly Airbus aircraft or want one generic autopilot panel for many unrelated airplane types.
Is the MOZA MA3F EFCM worth it?
Based on my Fenix A320 testing, yes, it offers a lot for the money.
The important qualifier is that I would judge it after updating the firmware and calibrating it, not before.
Once that was done, the panel became exactly what I wanted it to be: a physical Airbus control interface that I could use naturally throughout the flight without constantly returning to the virtual cockpit.
For a full FCU plus two EFIS modules at $347 USD, that is a compelling package.
Frequently asked questions
Does the MOZA MA3F work with the Fenix A320?
Yes. I personally tested the complete MA3F EFCM setup with the Fenix A320 in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024.
Does the MA3F have push-pull knobs?
Yes. The main Airbus FCU controls support physical push-pull interaction.
What should I do if push-pull is not working?
In my case, updating the firmware and running calibration resolved the issue.
Can I buy only the FCU?
Yes. The center FCU and the two EFIS modules are sold separately.
How much does the complete setup cost?
At the time of my review, the FCU was $149 USD and each EFIS module was $99 USD, for a total of $347 USD before shipping and taxes.
Is it full size?
The system is designed around full-size Airbus A320-style panel dimensions.
Disclosure
MOZA provided the unit used for my review. My conclusions are based on my own testing with the Fenix A320 in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024.