The WINGFLEX overhead panel is designed to bring realistic Airbus system management into a home flight simulator setup. As part of the Battle of the Airbus Overheads comparison series, this panel sits between two established reference points - the premium Skalarki overhead and the flexible, budget-friendly Rowsfire option. After extensive testing in MSFS 2020 and MSFS 2024 with the Fenix A320, it is clear that WINGFLEX targets simmers who want strong system coverage, believable switch logic, and immersive lighting without stepping into full training-grade pricing.
Key takeaways
- Balanced positioning between premium Skalarki and value-focused Rowsfire
- Smaller controls allow broader system coverage on one panel
- Realistic switch logic including locking and lift-to-switch mechanisms
- Physical dome and external lighting enhances night immersion
- Plug-and-play setup through WINGFLEX Bridge software
First impressions and unboxing
The panel arrives in a well-designed branded box with clean graphics that immediately signals serious simulation hardware. Inside, the layout is simple and organized. The package includes a quick installation guide, a USB cable for data connection, a multi-country power adapter with interchangeable plug support, and the overhead panel itself.
In hand, the first impression differs noticeably from Skalarki. The WINGFLEX unit is lighter and the construction feels more plasticky at first touch. That initial reaction may raise questions, especially if you are familiar with fully metal panels. However, real judgment comes once the unit is mounted and integrated into actual flight flows.
Design philosophy and layout
Compared to Skalarki, the WINGFLEX panel is wider and longer, using its footprint to accommodate more functionality. Compared to Rowsfire, it clearly aims for broader system coverage and deeper operational realism.
The defining design choice is control size. Buttons, switches, and knobs are smaller than those on Skalarki. This is not a cost-cutting compromise. It is a deliberate decision that allows more systems to fit on the panel. The result is fewer moments where a mouse is needed during normal Airbus flows.
Most switch, button, and knob positions closely replicate the real Airbus layout. Not every element is one-to-one, but muscle memory adapts quickly in practice. The panel is built around workflow rather than strict dimensional replication.
Switch logic and operational realism
Where the WINGFLEX overhead truly stands out is in switch behavior. The APU master button locks down in position, closely mirroring the real aircraft. The APU start button is self-resetting, as expected in an A320. The emergency exit lights switch requires lifting before changing position, replicating real-world logic.
These details have a direct impact on immersion. Startup and shutdown flows feel intentional and structured. Fire tests function properly and follow realistic sequences during cockpit preparation.
Testing was conducted extensively in MSFS 2020 and MSFS 2024 using the Fenix A320, including numerous live streams. In day-to-day use, the logic and interaction remain consistent and reliable.
Physical lighting and night immersion
Lighting is one of the most distinctive features of this panel. The dome light is not only simulated in the aircraft. It physically turns on and illuminates the surrounding space. During night sessions, flipping that switch changes the atmosphere immediately.
Navigation lights, strobes, and beacon indicators physically illuminate behind the panel. The overhead becomes part of the environment rather than just a control interface. Light intensity can be adjusted or disabled through software for those who prefer a darker cockpit.
This level of physical lighting integration is often associated with larger cockpit builds. Here, it is implemented in a home-focused overhead panel.
Software and aircraft compatibility
The panel uses WINGFLEX Bridge software with a plug-and-play approach. After opening the software and selecting an aircraft, the panel synchronizes automatically. There is no need for manual mapping or third-party configuration tools.
Both software and firmware can be upgraded online, allowing the hardware to evolve over time. Compatibility with numerous aircraft is clearly a design focus. In testing, performance with the Fenix A320 was solid and consistent.
Power and mounting options
Connectivity is straightforward. The panel connects via USB and uses a 5V power supply. Once mounted, cable management remains clean and unobtrusive.
The rear bracket allows the panel to sit directly on a desk. For more flexible positioning, an optional VESA stand is available. It supports side or overhead mounting, is adjustable, and secures to a sturdy desktop without drilling.
Comparison - Skalarki vs Rowsfire vs WINGFLEX
Skalarki remains the premium realism benchmark. Its heavier construction, fully metal build, and larger controls deliver the closest feel to professional training hardware.
Rowsfire focuses on flexibility and affordability. It is compact and well suited to users who rely on custom mappings and adaptable configurations.
WINGFLEX positions itself directly between those two extremes. It is lighter and more plasticky than Skalarki but offers far more complete system coverage than Rowsfire. Controls are smaller to maximize functionality. Switch logic is convincing. Lighting is the most immersive among the three. Aircraft compatibility is strong.
Final assessment
The WINGFLEX overhead panel does not attempt to replace high-end training-style hardware. It also does not compete primarily on price. Instead, it combines operational coverage, believable system logic, physical lighting, and ease of use into a balanced solution.
For Airbus simmers who want more realism than entry-level options but do not require full metal, training-grade construction, this panel occupies a compelling middle ground. In the evolving landscape of flight simulator hardware, it represents a practical and thoughtfully engineered option.